Copyright infringement or not? The debate over downloading music
http://www.readwritethink.org/lessons/lesson_view.asp?id=855
A lesson plan for grades 9–12 English Language Arts
This lesson takes advantage of students’ interest in music and audio sharing as part of a persuasive debate unit. After assessing their own opinions on the matter, students investigate the controversial topic of downloading music from the Internet. Students draw upon their prior knowledge and experience by discussing their own sources of music and Internet practices, and they conduct Internet research to investigate the history and legal issues of copyright infringement related to sharing audio files. Then, using graphic organizers and interactive Web tools, students synthesize information and evaluate content and point of view. After students map their information, they choose a position and develop persuasive arguments to present in a class debate on the subject of downloading music. Readwritethink provides project guidelines and rubrics, links to online debate over downloading music, and interactive online resources that explain debate structure and roles. This lesson suggests extension activities, offers links to web resources, and provides opportunities for student-self reflection.
North Carolina Curriculum Alignment
English Language Arts (2004)
Grade 9
- Goal 3: The learner will examine argumentation and develop informed opinions.
- Objective 3.02: Express an informed opinion that:
- states clearly a personal view.
- is logical and coherent.
- engages the reader's interest or curiosity.
- Objective 3.03: Support that informed opinion by:
- providing relevant and convincing reasons.
- using various types of evidence, such as experience or facts.
- using appropriate and effective language, reasons, and organizational structure for the audience and purpose.
- demonstrating awareness of the possible questions, concerns, or counterarguments of the audience.
- Objective 3.04: Demonstrate the ability to read, listen to and view a variety of increasingly complex print and non-print argumentative texts appropriate to grade level and course literary focus, by:
- selecting, monitoring, and modifying as necessary reading strategies appropriate to readers' purpose.
- identifying and analyzing text components (such as organizational structures, story elements, organizational features) and evaluating their impact on the text.
- providing textual evidence to support understanding of and reader's response to text.
- demonstrating comprehension of main idea and supporting details.
- summarizing key events and/or points from text.
- making inferences, predicting, and drawing conclusions based on text.
- identifying and analyzing personal, social, historical or cultural influences, contexts, or biases.
- making connections between works, self and related topics.
- analyzing and evaluating the effects of author's craft and style.
- analyzing and evaluating the connections or relationships between and among ideas, concepts, characters and/or experiences.
- identifying and analyzing elements of argumentative environment found in text in light of purpose, audience, and context.
- Objective 3.02: Express an informed opinion that:
Grade 10
- Goal 3: The learner will defend argumentative positions on literary or nonliterary issues.
- Objective 3.01: Examine controversial issues by:
- sharing and evaluating initial personal response.
- researching and summarizing printed data.
- developing a framework in which to discuss the issue (creating a context).
- compiling personal responses and researched data to organize the argument.
- presenting data in such forms as a graphic, an essay, a speech, or a video.
- Objective 3.01: Examine controversial issues by:
- Goal 4: The learner will critically interpret and evaluate experiences, literature, language, and ideas.
- Objective 4.04: Evaluate the information, explanations, or ideas of others by:
- identifying clear, reasonable criteria for evaluation.
- applying those criteria using reasoning and substantiation.
- Objective 4.04: Evaluate the information, explanations, or ideas of others by:
Grade 11
- Goal 3: The learner will demonstrate increasing sophistication in defining issues and using argument effectively.
- Objective 3.01: Use language persuasively in addressing a particular issue by:
- finding and interpreting information effectively.
- recognizing propaganda as a purposeful technique.
- establishing and defending a point of view.
-responding respectfully to viewpoints and biases. - Objective 3.03: Use argumentation for:
- interpreting researched information effectively.
- establishing and defending a point of view.
- addressing concerns of the opposition.
- using logical strategies (e.g., deductive and inductive reasoning, syllogisms, analogies) and sophisticated techniques (e.g., rhetorical devices, parallelism, irony, concrete images).
-developing a sense of completion.
- Objective 3.01: Use language persuasively in addressing a particular issue by:
- Goal 4: The learner will critically analyze text to gain meaning, develop thematic connections, and synthesize ideas.
- Objective 4.03: Assess the power, validity, and truthfulness in the logic of arguments given in public and political documents by:
- identifying the intent and message of the author or artist.
- recognizing how the author addresses opposing viewpoints.
- articulating a personal response to the message and method of the author or artist.
-evaluating the historical significance of the work.
- Objective 4.03: Assess the power, validity, and truthfulness in the logic of arguments given in public and political documents by:
Grade 12
- Goal 3: The learner will be prepared to enter issues of public concern as an advocate.
- Objective 3.01: Research and define issues of public concern by:
- using a variety of resources such as the media center, on-line resources, interviews, and personal reflection.
-specifying the nature of an issue, including the various claims made and the reasoning that supports these claims. - Objective 3.02: Organize and deliver an argument so that an intended audience respects it by:
- wording the claim clearly.
- specifying reasons in support of the claim that are likely to be convincing.
-- adopting an appropriate tone and stance toward the issue.
- Objective 3.01: Research and define issues of public concern by:


