Evauating your state's interests
Use the following resources to gather background information on your state:
Basic information
- What was your state's population in 2000?
- How many congressional districts did your state have in 2000? (Use the
information from 2000, because FairData doesn't have current data available
yet.)
- How many electoral votes did your state have in 2000?
- To which candidate(s) did your state's electoral votes go in 2000?
- How would your state's electoral votes have been proportioned under each
of the following methods of voting (see the discussion
guidelines for an
explanation):
- proportional voting
- congressional district voting
- Humphrey compromise
- What was the weight of an individual vote in your state in the 2000 presidential
election? (Use the method in part 4 of
the reading.)
Evaluation
- Given your state's size, which of the following proposals would give your
state more or less of a say in a presidential election? Which would give individual
voters more or less of a say?
- direct popular election
- proportional voting
- congressional district voting
- Humphrey compromise
- Does your state have particular geographic interests that deserve special
representation? Do these interests justify giving electoral votes to the
entire state?
- Is there a great deal of variation among the congressional districts of
your state? In what way (race, political party affiliation, poverty level,
etc.)? Do these variations justify a plan in which individual districts have
electoral votes?
- Would an individual vote in your state have "weighed" more or less under
each of the following alternative methods of voting:
- direct popular election
- proportional voting
- congressional district voting
- Humphrey compromise
If you can't tell or if you think it would depend on some other factor, explain.