LEARN NC

K–12 teaching and learning · from the UNC School of Education

Learn more

Related pages

  • Maya Angelou: Study and response to "Still I Rise": Students read biographical information on Maya Angelou and her poem, "Still I Rise." Students identify support and elaboration in poem, then respond by either writing a letter to the author or his/her own poem in response.
  • Using extended similes to elaborate and add style: Students will analyze a series of extended similes, develop criteria for strong and weak extended similes, and begin using extended similes as a tool for elaboration in their own writing.
  • Romeo and Juliet: The Balcony Scene (Act 2, Scene 2): O Romeo, Romeo! Wherefore art thou Romeo? Lesson will help struggling readers to comprehend figurative language and overall meaning in the famous balcony scene. It will also compare text to two media depictions. This lesson has been created with exceptional children and limited English proficient (novice low) students in mind.

Related topics

Help

Please read our disclaimer for lesson plans.

Legal

The text of this page is copyright ©2008. See terms of use. Images and other media may be licensed separately; see captions for more information and read the fine print.

Learning outcomes

Students will increase their understanding of individual styles by investigating and comparing the styles of the authors they have read together.

Teacher planning

Time required for lesson

3 days

Materials/resources

Students will share the results of their study by varied methods, including computer presentations.

Technology resources

A monitor visible to the class is helpful for computer presentations.

Pre-activities

This exercise comes at the mid-point or end of a study of literature.

Activities

Day 1

  1. The teacher gives each student a list of ten authors already studied by the whole class.
  2. Students arrange the authors according to their style from the most “ornate” to the most “plain.” This is done by locating each author along a line with “ornate” at one end and “plain” at the other. One author is assigned to each end, then the others listed in order between them.
  3. Students in pairs then select a method of comparison, which will be used metaphorically to describe the authors’ individual styles. For example, students choosing a “musical instrument” series of metaphors might select the organ for the most ornate/rich/many-voiced end of the scale, and a flute for the most simple/plain end. Along the line between the two, they would range eight other instruments. Each of these would then correspond to an author.

Day 2

  1. Students work in pairs to analyze the authors’ styles in terms of type/length of sentences, difficulty of vocabulary, occurrence of figures of speech, frequency and type of allusions, and syntax. They select a representative short passage from each author and develop a class presentation based on their series of metaphors.
  2. Authors’ styles are metaphorically compared to examples from the following grouped examples:
    • music (need not be of the same period as the author) - ten musical scores or parts of scores
    • footwear (tennis shoes, boots. . .)
    • painting - ten paintings
    • outerwear (raincoat, shawl. . .)
    • smells (fresh bread, herbs. . .)
    • foods - ten dishes
    • musical instruments - ten
    • hairdo’s
    • vehicles
    • hats
    • colors
    • dances
    • dresses/suits
    • socks/hose
    • type fonts

Day 3

  1. Students make presentations.
  2. During the class presentations, one student reads a short selection by each author while the other student displays the appropriate example from the chosen metaphorical series. The display might be via a class-visible monitor (for paintings), a CD-player or keyboard (musical selections), an overhead projector (type fonts), or held-up objects (shoes). A time limit is set for each presentation depending on the time available and the number of students in the class.
  3. During the presentations, each student records the metaphors selected for the ten authors.

Assessment

Students are graded on the accuracy, interest, and inventiveness of their presentations.

After the presentations,the teacher gives the students a quotation test consisting of ten selections, one for each of the authors targeted in the review. These should be selections from works other than those studied by the class. Based on the authors’ individual styles, students decide who wrote which selection.

Supplemental information

The most successful was “cars,” which involved a camera-toting trip to the student parking lot and identification and pictures of the “Milton” of all cars, the “Burns” car, the “Blake” car, etc. “Socks” made an interesting metaphorical series, as the students compared the “texture” of the ten poets.

North Carolina Curriculum Alignment

English Language Arts (2004)

Grade 12

  • Goal 5: The learner will deepen understanding of British literature through exploration and extended engagement.
    • Objective 5.02: Extend engagement with selected works of British literature by:
      - observing how the imaginative experience of literature broadens and enriches real life.
      - relating style, meaning, and genre (including fiction, non-fiction, drama, and poetry).
      - applying literary, grammatical, and rhetorical terms of literature.
      - demonstrating in various print and non-print media the significance of works.
      -discerning the effect of interpreting literature from various critical perspectives.