LEARN NC

K–12 teaching and learning · from the UNC School of Education

Learn more

Related pages

  • Deaf learners and successful cognitive achievement: This article surveys relevant literature on the cognitive potential of deaf learners and asserts that, under appropriate conditions, support, and instruction, deaf students can succeed in inclusive settings. Includes a list of ideal instructional conditions for deaf students in the inclusive classroom.

Related topics

Help

Please read our disclaimer for lesson plans.

Legal

The text of this page is copyright ©2009. See terms of use. Images and other media may be licensed separately; see captions for more information and read the fine print.

Benchmark assessments are short tests administered throughout the school year that give teachers immediate feedback on how students are meeting academic standards. Regular use of benchmark assessments is seen by many as a tool to measure student growth and design curriculum to meet individual learning needs.1

Standardized benchmark assessments

Typically, on the school-wide level, benchmark testing couples student performance with extensive reporting systems in order to break down test results by the same student categories required under the federal No Child Left Behind Act (i.e. race, income, disability, and English proficiency) in addition to providing individual progress reports at the district, school, classroom, and student levels.2

According to the California Department of Education, benchmark assessments often include performance tasks, but more frequently use “standardized administration and scoring procedures to help maintain validity, reliability, and fairness.”3 Teachers usually administer common benchmark assessments to all students in the same course and grade level in the district at prescribed intervals — most often at the end of a unit of study or at the end of a quarter. “Common assessment instruments measure proficiency on subsets of standards and might include writing samples, literary responses, oral reports, demonstrations showing understanding of how-to-manuals, dramatizations, open-ended mathematics problems, memory maps, laboratory investigations, keyboarding or typing tests, and projects using specialized software in the school’s computer lab.”4 Teachers can use these standardized assessments to evaluate the degree to which students have mastered selected standards in both their classrooms and to compare with other grade-level classrooms in the district.

Characteristics of standardized benchmark assessments

Standardized benchmark assessments typically:

  • are given periodically, from three times a year to as often as once a month;
  • focus on reading and mathematics skills, taking about an hour per subject;
  • reflect state or district academic-content standards; and
  • measure students’ progress through the curriculum and/or on material in state exams.5

State-aligned benchmark assessments are generally created for and distributed to school districts by test preparation companies like Edison Schools, Pearson, Princeton Review and ETS.

Critics of high-stakes, standardized benchmark assessments explain that these tests encourage “teaching to the test.”6 On the other hand, proponents of benchmark assessments claim that when used correctly, these tests have the potential to give specific feedback on the academic areas in which individual students need the most assistance. Supporters also suggest that when benchmarks are created in alignment with state standards, they enable teachers to more accurately “gauge students’ performance against district standards.”7

Teacher-developed benchmark assessments

Myra Pasquier and Susan Gomez-Zwiep (2006) recommend several tips to teachers wanting to create their own benchmark assessments to measure students’ developmental growth.8 First, Pasquier and Gomez-Zwiep suggest that questions must be worded carefully so that the expected answer is clear to students and that each question must be structured around an end goal. Paswquier and Gomez-Zwiep also advise that teachers use clear rubrics to demonstrate what their expectations are for student work. Developing appropriate benchmark assessments takes time and practice; consequently, Pasquier and Gomez-Zwiep caution teachers to be patient and to improve their own content knowledge before implementing benchmark assessments in their practice.